Qudrat Ullah v. Municipal Board, Bareilly
Rule established
A lease exceeding one year without a registered instrument does not create a valid leasehold interest; it may be treated as month-to-month tenancy
Facts
- A lease was created for a period exceeding one year through an unregistered written agreement
- The lessee claimed leasehold rights for the full term stated in the agreement
- The lessor argued the lease was invalid for want of registration
Issue
- Whether an unregistered lease for a term exceeding one year creates a valid leasehold interest under TPA.
Held
- No. S.107 mandates that a lease from year to year, or for any term exceeding one year, can be made only by a registered instrument. An unregistered agreement for such a lease does not create the intended leasehold. However, it may operate as a month-to-month tenancy under S.106 (implied from the tenant's possession and payment of rent).
Ratio Decidendi
S.107 is mandatory: leases exceeding one year require registration. Without it, the intended term (e.g., 5 years) is not legally created. But since the tenant is in possession and paying rent, S.106 implies a month-to-month tenancy (terminable by 15 days' notice for buildings). This preserves some tenant rights while enforcing the registration requirement.
How to use it in an exam
Use when the problem involves an unregistered lease for more than one year. Key line: "Lease > 1 year without registration: intended term is void, but a month-to-month tenancy under S.106 may be implied."
Source
Source: Mulla TPA 13th ed.
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.