Vidhyadhar v. Manikrao
Rule established
Delivery of possession without a registered sale deed does not constitute a valid sale for immovable property valued above Rs.100
Facts
- The seller delivered possession of immovable property (valued above Rs.100) to the buyer
- Full consideration was paid
- However, no registered sale deed was executed
- The buyer claimed to be the owner based on possession and payment
Issue
- Whether delivery of possession coupled with full payment of price constitutes a valid sale of immovable property valued above Rs.100 in the absence of a registered sale deed.
Held
- No. S.54 mandates that a sale of tangible immovable property of value Rs.100 or more can be made only by a registered instrument. Delivery of possession and payment of price, however complete, do not constitute a sale in the absence of a registered deed. The buyer acquires no title.
Ratio Decidendi
S.54 is mandatory: "such transfer, in the case of tangible immovable property of the value of one hundred rupees and upwards... can be made only by a registered instrument." The word "only" leaves no room for alternative modes. Possession and payment may give rise to equitable rights (S.53A), but not legal title.
How to use it in an exam
Use to reinforce that registration is mandatory for S.54. Key line: "Possession + payment ≠ sale; only a registered sale deed transfers title to immovable property above Rs.100."
Source
Source: Mulla TPA 13th ed.
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.