State of Maharashtra v. National Construction Co
Rule established
Unconditional bank guarantee is independent of underlying contract; courts cannot restrain invocation except for fraud or irretrievable injustice
Facts
- National Construction Co was awarded a government construction contract
- It furnished a performance bank guarantee through its bankers in favour of the State of Maharashtra
- Disputes arose in the underlying contract regarding delays and completion
- The State invoked the bank guarantee
- National Construction obtained an injunction restraining payment, arguing the underlying dispute showed no breach
Issue
- Whether a court can grant an injunction restraining encashment of an unconditional bank guarantee when the underlying contract is disputed.
Held
- The Supreme Court set aside the injunction. An unconditional bank guarantee is an independent commercial instrument akin to cash. The bank's obligation is to pay upon demand without investigating the underlying dispute. Courts should not interfere with encashment unless the party seeking injunction establishes: (a) fraud of an egregious nature vitiating the guarantee, or (b) special equities/irretrievable injustice that cannot be compensated by damages.
Ratio Decidendi
An unconditional bank guarantee is an autonomous contract independent of the underlying transaction. The bank must pay upon invocation. Courts will not restrain encashment except for established fraud or irretrievable injustice.
How to use it in an exam
Primary authority for bank guarantee questions. Key line: "A bank guarantee is an independent contract; courts will not interfere except for fraud or irretrievable injustice." Always cite alongside UP Cooperative Federation v. Singh Consultants (1988).
Source
Source: SCC Online
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.