Prakash Singh v. Union of India
Rule established
Seven directives for police reform: State Security Commission, fixed DGP tenure, fixed SHO tenure, separation of investigation from law and order, Police Establishment Board, Police Complaints Authority, National Security Commission.
Facts
- Prakash Singh (former DGP) filed PIL highlighting systemic problems in Indian policing: political interference, lack of accountability, corruption, and inefficiency.
- The National Police Commission (1977-81) and multiple reform committees had recommended changes that remained unimplemented for decades.
- The Supreme Court intervened to direct structural reform.
Issue
- What reforms are necessary to ensure professional, accountable, and effective policing in India?
Held
- State Security Commission to lay down policy guidelines and evaluate police performance.
- Fixed tenure for DGP (minimum 2 years) to insulate from political transfers.
- Fixed tenure for SP and SHO (minimum 2 years) at operational level.
- Separation of investigation from law and order functions.
- Police Establishment Board for transfers, postings, and service matters.
Ratio Decidendi
Effective criminal justice depends on professional policing. Political interference in police functioning undermines rule of law, violates Art.21 (fair investigation), and compromises Art.14 (equal protection). Structural reform through institutional mechanisms is necessary to ensure that police serve the law, not political masters.
How to use it in an exam
- Part A (6 marks): List 7 directives. Cite for questions on police role and accountability under BNSS.
- Part B (15 marks): Use for: (a) role of police under BNSS, (b) separation of investigation from prosecution (Directorate of Prosecution), (c) accountability mechanisms, (d) Art.21 and fair investigation.
- Key line for exam: "Policing must be insulated from political interference through institutional mechanisms to ensure professional and accountable law enforcement."
Source
Source: SCC
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.