The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services
Rule established
Photocopying portions of textbooks for educational instruction falls within the fair dealing exception under S.52(1)(i) of the Copyright Act, even when done through a commercial intermediary
Facts
- Rameshwari Photocopy Services operated a licensed photocopy shop within the premises of the Delhi School of Economics (part of Delhi University)
- The shop prepared "course packs" for students: compilations of photocopied excerpts from prescribed textbooks, based on reading lists provided by professors
- Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, and Taylor & Francis sued for copyright infringement
- The course packs contained substantial portions (individual chapters) from copyrighted academic texts
- The publishers argued that systematic commercial photocopying for profit cannot constitute fair dealing
- Delhi University intervened arguing that the photocopying was for educational instruction
Issues
- Whether preparation of course packs by a commercial photocopy shop for university students constitutes infringement under S.51 of the Copyright Act, 1957
- Whether S.52(1)(i) ("reproduction by a teacher or pupil in the course of instruction") covers photocopying done through a commercial agent on behalf of teachers/students
Held
- S.52(1)(i) is a broad educational exception not limited by the identity of the person operating the photocopier
- The purpose of the copying (instruction) determines the exception, not the commercial nature of the intermediary
- Copyright must yield to the right to education; India's copyright law deliberately provides wider educational exceptions than many Western jurisdictions
- The course pack is an instrumentality of instruction prescribed by the teacher; its preparation is "in the course of instruction"
Ratio Decidendi
Section 52(1)(i) of the Copyright Act provides a broad educational exception. The reproduction of copyrighted works for the purpose of instructional use by teachers and students is not infringement, even when the physical act of reproduction is performed by a commercial photocopy service acting as an agent of the educational institution. The test is the purpose of reproduction (educational instruction), not the identity or commercial nature of the reproducer.
How to use it in an exam
- This is the go-to case for any Part C problem involving photocopying, course packs, or educational use of copyrighted material. The examiner will typically present a scenario where a library, photocopy shop, or digital platform reproduces portions of copyrighted works for students. Apply the DU Photocopy Case ratio: if the purpose is educational instruction and the reproduction is linked to a teacher's prescribed reading, S.52(1)(i) protects it.
- Key line for exam: "Copyright, specially in the domain of education, must not be allowed to obstruct the pursuit of academic instruction."
- ---
Source
Source: Delhi High Court Official Website
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.