Government of Andhra Pradesh v Thummala Krishna Rao
Rule established
Assigned lands granted to landless poor under government schemes cannot be alienated, and any transfer in violation of conditions of assignment is void
Facts
- The Government of Andhra Pradesh (AP) assigned lands to landless poor persons under various land assignment schemes
- The assignees were prohibited from alienating the assigned lands under the conditions of the grant
- Certain assignees transferred their lands to third parties in violation of the prohibition
- The Government sought to resume the lands on the ground of breach of conditions
Issue
- Whether the prohibition on alienation of assigned lands is valid, and whether transfers made in violation of such prohibition are void ab initio.
Held
- The prohibition on alienation of assigned lands is a valid condition attached to the grant
- Transfers made in violation of the statutory prohibition are void and confer no title on the transferee
- The State has the right to resume lands where conditions of assignment are breached
- The purpose of assignment is to provide livelihood to the landless poor, and alienation defeats this social welfare objective
- Third-party purchasers acquire no rights and cannot claim bona fide purchase as a defence
Ratio Decidendi
Lands assigned to the landless poor under government schemes are burdened with a statutory prohibition on alienation that flows from the social welfare objective of the assignment. Any alienation in breach of the conditions of grant is void ab initio, and the State retains the power to resume such lands for reassignment to other eligible landless persons.
How to use it in an exam
- Core authority for the principle that assigned lands cannot be alienated
- Use to distinguish between absolute ownership and conditional grants by the State
- Relevant for questions on land reforms and protection of weaker sections
- Key line: "The object of assigning lands to the landless is to provide them with a source of livelihood; permitting alienation would defeat the very purpose of the assignment."
Source
Source: AIR 1982 SC 1081; verified via SCC Online
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.