Gloucester Grammar School Case
Rule established
Damage resulting from lawful competition, absent violation of any legal right, is damnum sine injuria and not actionable.
Facts
- The plaintiff operated a grammar school and charged fees to students
- The defendant, a former schoolmaster, opened a competing school in the same town
- Students left the plaintiff's school for the defendant's, causing the plaintiff's fee income to decline substantially
- The plaintiff sued for this financial loss
Issue
- Whether a person who lawfully competes for business, causing financial loss to an existing competitor, is liable for that loss.
Held
- The defendant's act of opening a competing school was itself entirely lawful
- No legal right of the plaintiff was violated merely by the defendant's lawful competition
- Genuine financial loss, however real, is not actionable where it flows only from the exercise of another's own lawful rights
- This is damnum sine injuria: damage without legal injury
Ratio Decidendi
Where damage results from lawful competition or the lawful exercise of one's own rights, and no legal right of the plaintiff is violated, no action lies, however real and substantial the financial loss suffered. Damnum sine injuria is not actionable.
How to use it in an exam
- Key line: "In the Gloucester Grammar School Case (1410), loss caused by lawful competition, absent violation of any legal right, was held to be damnum sine injuria and not actionable."
- Pair with Ashby v White (1703) to illustrate the damnum sine injuria / injuria sine damno distinction as a matched pair.
Source
Source: Year Book 11 Hen IV
This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.
Cited in study notes
Elements of TortDamnum sine injuria