Bellamy v Sabine

(1857) 1 De G & J 566Court of Appeal in Chancery (England)1857Property Law
property-lawlis-pendenspublic-policysection-52

Rule established

Lis pendens operates on principle of public policy and necessity, not on notice

Facts

  • Property was transferred during pendency of a suit concerning it
  • Transferee claimed no knowledge of the pending suit
  • Question: does lis pendens require notice to the transferee?

Issue

  1. Whether the doctrine of lis pendens is based on notice or on an independent principle of public policy.

Held

  • Lis pendens is NOT based on notice. It rests on the principle that the adjudication of the court must not be rendered nugatory by private transfers during litigation. It applies regardless of whether the transferee had actual knowledge.

Ratio Decidendi

The foundation is necessity and public policy: if parties could defeat judgments by transferring during suit, the entire judicial process would be futile. Whether the buyer knew or did not know is irrelevant: the doctrine applies to protect the integrity of court proceedings.

How to use it in an exam

Foundational authority whenever S.52 is discussed. Cite to answer "Is lis pendens based on notice?" Always NO, it is public policy. Key line: "Lis pendens operates on necessity, not on notice."

Source

Source: (1857) 1 De G & J 566

This is an educational summary, not the judgment itself. Cite the reported version in professional or academic work.

Cited in study notes

Doctrine of Lis PendensNature of S.52; not notice-based